Legal Opinion

Blieden v. Greenspan

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 10, 1987No. 09 86 258 CVPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BROOKSHIRE, Justice.

Appeal from the granting of a summary judgment. Hyman Blieden (Testator) died, testate, on June 4, 1969. The Testator’s Will (hereinafter “Will”) was duly admitted into probate in the County Court of Jefferson County. Testator, in his Last Will and Testament, provided for the care and support of his surviving widow, Doris Blieden, creating a trust for the benefit of Doris. Testator set out that his whole estate consisted entirely of community property with his wife, Doris, writing in his last Will:

“1.
“It is my intention hereby and hereunder to dispose only of my…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Hidalgo v. Surety Savings and Loan AssociationTexas Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Houston First American Savings v. MusickTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Mendoza v. Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Stewart v. SelderTexas Supreme Court · 1971

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. TPS Freight Distributors, Inc. v. Texas Commerce Bank-DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990
  2. Blieden v. GreenspanTexas Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Petty v. PrivetteCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1989
  4. Blieden v. GreenspanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API