Maud & Carrow v. Coppinger
Court of Appeals of Texas
Appeal from Tarrant. Tried below before Hon. Irby Duhelin.
1Opinion of the Court
CONNER, Chief Justice.
Appellee has urged a motion to strike out the statement of facts found in the record, and after careful consideration we have concluded that in the interest of the public service it is our duty to do so. The statement in question covers some 149 pages of the record, and appears to consist very largely of a stenographic report of the trial, abounding in instances of questions propounded to the witnesses, in answers thereto given on examination in chief, on cross-examination, re-examination, recross-examination, etc., and in objections urged to the introduction and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- McKinney v. FortTexas Supreme Court · 1853
- Irvin v. EdwardsTexas Supreme Court · 1898
3Cited by8 opinions
- Buster v. WarrenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1904
- Gough v. JonesTexas Commission of Appeals · 1919
- Coulter v. Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1922
- Kansas City Life Ins. Co. v. DuvallCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
- McCray v. KellyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.