Legal Opinion

Jones v. United States Parole Commission

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided August 5, 2016No. Civil Action No. 2016-0041Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PAUL B. JONES, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 16-0041 (BAH) ) UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION, ) ) Respondent. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION The petitioner, Paul B. Jones, seeks a “Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255,” ECF No. 1, contending that he was denied a timely probable cause hearing following his arrest on a parole violator warrant issued by the United States Parole Commission. Claiming a due process violation, the petitioner seeks $500,000 for each day spent in custody, 1 a probable cause hearing, “and/or…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Dale H. Sutherland v. Cecil McCall Chairman, United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
  3. Perkins v. HendersonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1995
  4. Stoddard v. WynnDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
  5. Vactor v. United States Parole CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API