Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 17, 1960No. 1419PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

The appellants, as defendants in the court below, were charged through an information with the larceny of a bull, being the property of one Earl Hendry. The defendants waived a jury trial, and the case was thereupon tried by the judge of the circuit court of Collier County. They were found guilty as charged and sentenced to a term of two years in the state prison.

Primarily, the point of this appeal, urged by the appellants, is that the evidence introduced by the state was insufficient to overcome the presumption of innocence afforded to them under the law because the state had failed to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Peele v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1944
  2. Farley v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1924

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Shaw v. ShawSupreme Court of Florida · 1976
  2. Westerman v. Shell's City, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1972
  3. Groneau v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
  4. Eizenman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961
  5. Safeguard Storage Properties, L.L.C. v. Donahue Favret Contractors, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2011

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API