Legal Opinion

Paulk v. Paulk

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 15, 1996No. 95-4331PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

We find no abuse of discretion in the trial court’s award of permanent periodic alimony. However, the final judgment improperly requires the payment of alimony “until further order of the court.” Permanent periodic alimony terminates on the death of either spouse or the remarriage of the receiving spouse. Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980). Because the error can be corrected without a reversal, we modify the final judgment to require payment of alimony until the death of either party or the remarriage of the former wife. Hunt v. Hunt, 481 So.2d 995 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986); Gold v.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Canakaris v. CanakarisSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
  2. Gold v. GoldDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  3. Hunt v. HuntDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Aguiar v. AguiarDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API