Legal Opinion

Sprinkle v. Burlington Northern Railroad

Montana Supreme Court

Decided March 7, 1989No. 88-485PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sheehy

Honorable Jack D. Shanstrom, United States Magistrate, United States District Court for the District of Montana has certified for our decision under Rule 44, Montana Rules of Appellate Procedure, a question of law as follows:

“Plaintiff commences a negligence action against defendant #1. Defendant #1 in turn joins defendant #2 seeking contribution. Prior to trial, defendant #1 settles with the plaintiff in return for a general release of all claims, including claims against defendant number 2. Can defendant #1 continue its action for contribution against defendant #2 under Montana law?”

In…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kennedy v. City of SawyerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980
  2. Bartlett v. New Mexico Welding Supply, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. State Ex Rel. Deere & Co. v. District Court of the Fifth Judicial DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Consolidated Freightways Corp. of Del. v. OsierMontana Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Question Submitted by the United States District Court for the District of Colorado Concerning Section 13-50.5-101, C.R.S. 1973 v. Vail Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Linder v. Missoula CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Holmberg v. StrongMontana Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Holmberg v. StrongMontana Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Holmberg v. StrongMontana Supreme Court · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API