Legal Opinion

Holt v. Mitchell

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 25, 1935No. 13,644PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Young

The parties appear in this court in the same order as in the lower court and will he designated herein as plaintiff and defendants.

A general demurrer to plaintiff’s supplemental complaint as amended, filed by the defendants Nettie A. Rhodes and Earl M. Deeds, was sustained by the trial court. Plaintiff elected to stand, and the case was dismissed. Plaintiff assigns error.

The facts as set forth in the complaint, and admitted by the demurrer, so far as material, are as follows: On November 20, 1925, defendants, James B. Mitchell and Minnie Mitchell, executed five promissory notes to M. M. Holt…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Institute Building & Loan Ass'n v. EdwardsNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1913
  2. McKenzie v. McKenzieSupreme Court of Vermont · 1880
  3. Capitol National Bank v. HolmesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1908
  4. Larson v. WhitleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1920

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Farmers Group, Inc. v. TrimbleColorado Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Davis v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
  3. Bennett v. WestfallCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946
  4. Copp v. MillenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Colorado Nat. Bank of Denver v. FE Biegert Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1968

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API