People v. Dendel
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
ON SECOND REMAND
Before: BORRELLO, P.J., and SAAD and WILDER, JJ. Saad, J.
In light of a recent United States Supreme Court case that further defines the scope of the rights granted under the Confrontation Clause, Melendez-Diaz v Massachusetts, 557 US _; 129 S Ct 2527; 174 L Ed 2d 314 (2009), our Supreme Court remanded this case for us to address whether the trial court violated defendant’s confrontation rights when it admitted expert testimony that was based on a report prepared by nontestifying forensic analysts. For the reasons set forth in this opinion, we affirm defendant’s conviction…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Melendez-Diaz v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- People v. HenryMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
- People v. McDadeMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013
- People of Michigan v. Raymond Curtis CarpMichigan Supreme Court · 2014
- Dendel v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
- In re the Personal Restraint of HacheneyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.