Legal Opinion

Huie v. Loud

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided December 15, 1868PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Equity. Injunction. Decided by Judge Collier. From Clayton county. The bill made the following case: James H. Waldrop sold to Wiley P. Mangum north quarter of lot No. 242, on-credit, giving bond for titles, and taking Mangum’s note for the purchase-money. This note was not paid, Jas. E. Johnson, Esq., was employed to collect it.

Read the full summary

Equity. Injunction. Decided by Judge Collier. From Clayton county. The bill made the following case: James H. Waldrop sold to Wiley P. Mangum north quarter of lot No. 242, on-credit, giving bond for titles, and taking Mangum’s note for the purchase-money. This note was not paid, Jas. E. Johnson, Esq., was employed to collect it. On the 4th July, 1862, said Waldrop made a regular fee-simple conveyance of said land to said Mangum, and delivered it to said Johnson, as Waldrop’s attorney. This deed was so made and left, when Waldrop was going to the "army, and in order that Johnson could, by levy…

1Opinion of the CourtWarner, J.

The questions of law, and the facts involved in this case, were, by agreement, submitted to the Chancellor in the Court below, who, upon consideration of the same, directed the jury to sign a decree perpetually enjoining Huie, the judgment creditor, from collecting his fi. fa. out of the property claimed by Mrs. Loud. This judgment of the Court is assigned for error here. The facts in the case, as presented by the record, *194are in substance as follows: Mangum purchased of Waldrop a tract- of land on credit, giving his note for the purchase money, taking Waldrop’s bond for titles, went into the…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Protestant Episcopal Church of Diocese v. Lowe Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1908
  2. Achey v. Coleman & RaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
  3. Burney Tailoring Co. v. CuzzortSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API