Edison v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
CASANUEVA, Judge.
George Edison Jr., one of four codefen-dants in a trial for trafficking in drugs by the constructive possession of more than twenty-eight grams of cocaine, contends that the evidence was legally insufficient to demonstrate that he had control over the contraband. We agree and reverse his judgment and sentence.
The facts of George Edison Jr.’s case are similar to those set out in the opinions concerning two of his codefendants, Tony Person and Alonzo Edison. Person v. State, 950 So.2d 1270 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007); Edison v. State, 954 So.2d 1285 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007). Detective…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
- Taylor v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
- Isaac v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
- J.S.M. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
- Wade v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
- Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
- Porter v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012