Legal Opinion

Fiscella v. Fridman

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 27, 1938PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

McLaughlin (Charles B.), J.

A plaintiff may obtain a sum¡mary judgment under rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice only in an action coming within one of the first eight subdivisions of said rule. The only equitable actions in which summary judgment is permitted are those enumerated in subdivisions 6, 7 and 8. Summary judgment may not be granted to a plaintiff in other equitable actions. (Lederer v. Wise Shoe Co., 276 N. Y. 459, 463; Newark Fire Ins. Co. v. Brill, 251 App. Div. 399; Bohlken v. Title Guarantee & T. Co., 248 id. 722; Anderson v. Title Guarantee & T. Co., Id. 895.) The present…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lederer v. Wise Shoe Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1938
  2. Newark Fire Insurance v. BrillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wolfman v. Wilson Building, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API