Legal Opinion

Smith v. Mahoney

New York Court of Appeals

Decided August 30, 1983PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without costs.

Petitioner submitted a designating petition with a cover sheet that omitted the title of the office for which he was running. This information is required by statute (Election Law, § 6-134, subd 2), with which there must be strict compliance (see Matter of Hutson v Bass, 54 NY2d 772, 773-774). Petitioner’s failure to include the necessary information is not excused by the fact that the form he used was supplied by the local board of elections. That body is not empowered to authorize,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hutson v. BassNew York Court of Appeals · 1981

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Liepshutz v. PalmateerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  2. Hargett v. JeffersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Brosnan v. BlackAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  4. Landry v. MansionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  5. Staber v. FidlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API