Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Thompson

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 4, 1984No. 8329DC578Published

1Opinion of the Court

319 S.E.2d 315 (1984)

Carol M. THOMPSON

v.

Donald O. THOMPSON; L & O, Inc., a corporation; and Robert B. Pryor, Trustee.

STEPP, GROCE, PINALES & COSGROVE, a Partnership

v.

Carol M. THOMPSON.

No. 8329DC578.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

September 4, 1984.

Lentz, Ball & Kelley, P.A. by Ervin L. Ball, Jr., Asheville, for defendant-appellant.

Stepp, Groce, Pinales & Cosgrove by Edwin R. Groce and W. Harley Stepp, Jr., Hendersonville, for intervenors-appellees.

JOHNSON, Judge.

The central question presented by this appeal is whether the contingent fee contract sued upon by the intervenor law firm in this…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Archbell v. ArchbellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  2. Baskerville v. BaskervilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  3. Osborne v. OsborneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  4. Archbell v. . ArchbellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  5. Covington v. RhodesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API