Thompson v. Thompson
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
319 S.E.2d 315 (1984)
Carol M. THOMPSON
v.
Donald O. THOMPSON; L & O, Inc., a corporation; and Robert B. Pryor, Trustee.
STEPP, GROCE, PINALES & COSGROVE, a Partnership
v.
Carol M. THOMPSON.
No. 8329DC578.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina.
September 4, 1984.
Lentz, Ball & Kelley, P.A. by Ervin L. Ball, Jr., Asheville, for defendant-appellant.
Stepp, Groce, Pinales & Cosgrove by Edwin R. Groce and W. Harley Stepp, Jr., Hendersonville, for intervenors-appellees.
JOHNSON, Judge.
The central question presented by this appeal is whether the contingent fee contract sued upon by the intervenor law firm in this…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Archbell v. ArchbellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
- Baskerville v. BaskervilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
- Osborne v. OsborneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
- Archbell v. . ArchbellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
- Covington v. RhodesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.