Legal Opinion

Securities & Exchange Commission v. World Capital Market, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 21, 2017No. 15-55325PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TALLMAN, Circuit Judge:

We address an issue of first impression involving the Securities and Exchange Commission’s ability to disgorge ill-gotten funds from so-called “relief defendants.” Victor Messina and International Market Ventures (“IMV”), contest their liability as relief defendants in the SEC’s enforcement action against Phil Ming Xu and various Xu-related entities for federal securities law violations arising out of a fraudulent investment scheme. The SEC claims that Messina and IMV received $5 million of the tens of millions of dollars Xu unlawfully raised through investor…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Douglas Leite v. Crane CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  2. Morrison v. National Australia Bank Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2010
  3. Cunningham v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  4. Data General Corp. v. Grumman Systems Support Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
  5. Securities & Exchange Commission v. RossCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Auto Ind. Pension Trust Fund v. Toshiba Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  2. SEC v. GastauerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2024
  3. SEC v. Sanchez Diaz MongeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2023
  4. United States v. Rapower-3, LLCDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2018
  5. Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. DebiexDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2025

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API