Legal Opinion

Noble Roman's, Inc. v. Hattenhauer Distrib. Co.

District Court, S.D. Indiana

Decided March 30, 2018No. Cause No. 1:17–cv–1415–WTL–DLPPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Id. at 16. The Franchise Agreements also provide that "[Noble Roman's] or its designee shall have the right at all reasonable times to review, audit, examine and copy the books and records of [Hattenhauer] as [Noble Roman's] may require at the Noble Roman's Pizza [location]." Id. at 17.

Pursuant to the Franchise Agreements, "[i]f any required royalty payments to [Noble Roman's] are delinquent, or if an *912inspection should reveal that such payments have been understated in any report to [Noble Roman's], then [Hattenhauer] shall immediately pay to [Noble Roman's] the amount overdue or understated…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Goodman v. National Security Agency, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  2. Janice Draper v. Timothy MartinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
  3. Fresh Cut, Inc. v. FazliIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Federal Communications Commission v. Airadigm Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  5. Trujillo v. Northwest Trustee Services, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2015

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. HealthTrackRx Indiana, Inc. v. RSUI Indemnity CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2025
  2. NATIONAL ASSET CONSULTANTS LLC v. MIDWEST HOLDINGS-INDIANAPOLIS, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API