Legal Opinion

United States v. Berrios

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided January 11, 2004No. Nos. 03-4111 & 03-4142PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

BRISCOE, Circuit Judge.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

Defendant Antenor Berrios appeals from two interlocutory orders issued by the district court in his misdemeanor criminal case. In appeal No. 03-4111, Berrios appeals the district court’s April 30, 2003, order compelling him to submit to a mental evaluation as a condition of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Midland Asphalt Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. United States v. CisnerosCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
  4. United States v. Louis Distasio, Sr., United States of America v. Jerry J. DistasioCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
  5. United States v. Ellery QueenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Berrios v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API