Legal Opinion

First Nat. Bank of Birmingham v. Haynes

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 19, 1938No. 6 Div. 179PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KNIGHT, Justice.

The appeal in this cause is prosecuted by appellant — complainant in the court below —from a decree of the circuit court sustaining the demurrers of the several respondents, separately interposed.,, to the amended bill.

The real purpose of the bill was to quiet title in the complainant, to certain real estate in Jefferson County, Alabama, but sought other incidental relief, all germane to the main purpose of the bill.

It appears from the averments of the bill that the respondent Phillip Ross owned certain real property in Jefferson County, and that on January 13, 1923, this…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Welsh v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
  2. Meyer Bros. v. MitchellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
  3. Ross v. ParksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  4. Gamble v. Black Warrior Coal Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  5. Cook v. Parham & BluntSupreme Court of Alabama · 1879

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ex Parte RobinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
  2. Maiden v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'nCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2011
  3. Saliba v. BrackinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  4. Crabtree v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  5. Wbt v. A.B./wildwood Limited Part.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API