Legal Opinion

Hulbert v. . Douglas

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1886PublishedCited by 12 opinions

This was the defendant Keogh’s appeal in the foregoing ease. The facts are the same as in the foregoing ease.

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, C. J.

It is conceded that the appellant, when owner of the note and its coupons, subject to the lien for the money advanced and for which it was held as collateral security, received from the maker $4,000 as a part payment, under an agreement that it should be entered as a credit, and that, without a disclosure of the fact, the note was endorsed for its full value, before anyone of the four attached coupons remaining had matured. The first coupon had been cut off and was retained by the appellant. The endorsement clearly rendered him liable as such, for all appearing to be due upon the face of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hughes v. . BooneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Montgomery v. . BladesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  2. Schnepp v. . RichardsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  3. Gibson v. . BarbourSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
  4. Bobbitt v. . StantonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
  5. Wrenn v. GrahamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API