City of Youngstown v. Traylor
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
[Cite as Youngstown v. Traylor, 123 Ohio St.3d 132,
2009-Ohio-4184.] CITY OF YOUNGSTOWN, APPELLANT, v. TRAYLOR, APPELLEE. [Cite as Youngstown v. Traylor, 123 Ohio St.3d 132,
2009-Ohio-4184.] Criminal liability — Vicious dogs — Youngstown Codified Ordinances 505.19 is rationally related to the city’s legitimate interest in protecting citizens from vicious dogs and therefore is constitutional — Conviction reinstated. (No. 2008-1460 — Submitted May 19, 2009 — Decided August 26, 2009.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Mahoning County, No. 07 MA 102, 2008-Ohio- 2971. __________________ SYLLABUS…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. HarrissSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Papachristou v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- State v. AndersonOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- Sentell v. New Orleans & Carrollton R. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.