Legal Opinion

City of Youngstown v. Traylor

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 26, 2009No. 2008-1460Published

1Opinion of the Court

[Cite as Youngstown v. Traylor, 123 Ohio St.3d 132,

2009-Ohio-4184.] CITY OF YOUNGSTOWN, APPELLANT, v. TRAYLOR, APPELLEE. [Cite as Youngstown v. Traylor, 123 Ohio St.3d 132,

2009-Ohio-4184.] Criminal liability — Vicious dogs — Youngstown Codified Ordinances 505.19 is rationally related to the city’s legitimate interest in protecting citizens from vicious dogs and therefore is constitutional — Conviction reinstated. (No. 2008-1460 — Submitted May 19, 2009 — Decided August 26, 2009.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Mahoning County, No. 07 MA 102, 2008-Ohio- 2971. __________________ SYLLABUS…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. United States v. HarrissSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  3. Papachristou v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. State v. AndersonOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Sentell v. New Orleans & Carrollton R. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API