Legal Opinion

Knoxville Tinware & Manufacturing Co. v. Howard

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided March 22, 1927PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the 'Court by

Judge McCandless—

^Reversing.

Plaintiff, the Knoxville Tinware Manufacturing Company, a corporation, sued defendants, E. M. Howard and B. D. Fannon, on a note of $1,000.00, subject to a credit of $500.00, and on an open account for $3,576.25. Howard and Fannon filed separate answers admitting liability on the note, but denying indebtedness on the account, each substantially alleging that they had been partners doing business under the firm name of American Safety Mine Appliance Company and engaged in the manufacture and ©ale of the Fannon safety powder flask and other…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  2. Bowlin v. ArcherCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
  3. Stiles v. LileCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. American Savings Life Insurance v. RiplingerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
  2. Equitable Life Assur. Soc. of U.S. v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935
  3. Equitable Life Assurance Society v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1935
  4. Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. BondCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
  5. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. WhitakerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API