Legal Opinion

Eastes v. Daubenspeck

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1853PublishedCited by 2 opinions

ERROR to the Hamilton Circuit Court.

1Per curiam

The bill of exceptions in this case, or what purports to be such, does not appear to be signed by any judge. The errors complained of arise upon no other part of the record.

We cannot take any notice of the contents of the alleged bill of exceptions in the absence of the authentication of a judge’s signature.

The judgment is affirmed, with 10 per cent, damages and costs.

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Toledo, Wabash, & Western Railway Co. v. RogersIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  2. City of Denver v. CapelliSupreme Court of Colorado · 1877