Legal Opinion

Lenhard v. Max Finkelstein, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 8, 1996PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum: "It is well settled that a jury verdict should not be set aside as contrary to the weight of the evidence unless the jury could not have reached the verdict by any fair interpretation of the evidence” (Buckenberger v Clark Constr. Corp., 208 AD2d 790, 791, citing Nicastro v Park, 113 AD2d 129, 134). The verdict finding that defendants were not negligent is based upon a fair interpretation of the evidence. The jury could have fairly determined that defendant O’Connell was not negligent in his operation of the truck and that he could not avoid the accident when plaintiff’s decedent…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Nicastro v. ParkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  2. Buckenberger v. C. Clark Construction Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  3. Buchberger v. BarrackAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  4. Weise v. LazoreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dennis v. Capital District Transportation AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. LESIO, WILLIAM T. v. ATTARDI, D.M.D., DAVID M.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API