Legal Opinion

Goree v. Cahill

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 16, 1912No. 3963PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error from District Court, Okmulgee County; Wade S. Stanfield, Judge. Application by S. D. Cahill and others for writ of mandamus to D. G. Goree and others, composing the Okmulgee County Election Board. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtDunn, J.

This case presents error from the distinct court of Okmulgee county, and is a proceeding in mandamus to compel the plaintiffs in error, composing the county election board of that county, to convene and canvass the returns of an alleged election held in the town of Morris in that county on the 2d day of April, 1912, for the purpose of electing a board of trus tees for the said town. On the final trial before the court a peremptory writ was issued, and, after the denial of a motion for new trial, the cause was lodged in this court for review.

Among the different grounds presented by the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Walker v. SanfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887
  2. Williams v. PotterIllinois Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Melvin's CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1871
  4. State ex rel. Wannemaker v. AlderWisconsin Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Whitcomb v. ChaseNebraska Supreme Court · 1909

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re Kelly's EstateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  2. Munger v. Town of WatongaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  3. Hall v. TurnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  4. Wallace v. Excise Board of Bryan CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  5. Toohey v. Town of CantonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API