Legal Opinion
Alireza Rabie Jahed Maryam Feizi Labon Rabie Jahed Tansagol Rabie Jahed v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 20, 2004No. 02-70487PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge TROTT; Dissent by Judge KOZINSKI.
TROTT, Circuit Judge:
Alireza Rabie Jahed (“Petitioner”), his wife, and their two children (collectively “Petitioners”) petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’s (“BIA”) order denying their motion to remand and dismissing their appeal of an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) order denying their respective asylum applications. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a), and we grant the petition.
BACKGROUND
A
Petitioners1 are citizens of Iran who applied for asylum in the United States on *994the grounds (1) that Petitioner Jahed had been…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Elias-ZacariasSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. VenturaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Screws v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Florida Power & Light Co. v. LorionSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Cesar M. Lopez v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Zakia Mashiri v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Mang Khup v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Mustafe Muse Jibril v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Reina Izabel Garcia-Martinez v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.