Emerson-Brantingham Implement Co. v. Giles
Utah Supreme Court
Appeal from District Court, Third District, Salt Lake County; Wilson McCarthy, Judge. Action by the Emerson-Brantingham Implement Company against J. H. Giles and E. M. Hanson. From an adverse judgment, defendant Hanson appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtGideon, J.
Plaintiff instituted this action on August 11, 1917, to recover judgment on five promissory notes and to foreclose a chattel mortgage given to secure the payment of the notes. The consideration for the notes was the sale of a Peerless threshing machine, with attachments, by plaintiff to defendants. A judgment by default for the sum of $1,360.54, together with costs and attorney’s fees, was entered against defendants on August 22, 1918. The notes bear date August 31, 1916. The judgment directed a sale of the chattels de*56scribed in the mortgage. The sale was had, and the property sold to…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Utah State Building & Loan Ass'n v. PerkinsUtah Supreme Court · 1918
- Board of Education v. WestUtah Supreme Court · 1919
3Cited by2 opinions
- Security Investment & Development Co. v. Gross, Kelly & Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1927
- G.S. Wood Mercantile Co., Reinc. v. DougallUtah Supreme Court · 1941