Wears v. Maxwell

Petitioner in the instant ease raises no jurisdictional questions. He attacks neither the validity of his indictments nor the jurisdiction of the trial court. He does not argue that he was deprived of any of his constitutional rights.

Petitioner’s sole contention is based on the fact that his sentence for escape was made to run concurrently with his sentences on the other charges against him. He argues that, inasmuch as Section 2901.11, Revised Code, provides that the sentence imposed for an escape shall be served at the conclusion of any existing confinement, and since under the sentence…