Legal Opinion · Dissent

Mainor v. Hayneville Telephone Co.

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided December 19, 1997No. 2960608Published

1Dissent

I conclude that the trial court made no reversible error by admitting the accident reports.

I agree with the majority that § 32-10-11, Ala. Code 1975, states that automobile accident reports are inadmissible; however, the statute has not been interpreted as an absolute bar to admission. Dean Gamble and Frank S. James III discussed the statute in Perspectives on the Evidence Law of Alabama. ADecade of Evolution, 1977-1987, 40 Ala. L.Rev. 95 (1987). They wrote:

"B. Rule # 2: Although a Statute May Declare Certain Types of Evidence Inadmissible, The Evidence May Still be Admitted.
"A second form of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Nettles v. BishopSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
  2. Pike Taxi Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
  3. Dennis v. ScarboroughSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
  4. Doctors Hospital of Mobile, Inc. v. KirkseySupreme Court of Alabama · 1973
  5. Gardner v. WilliamsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API