Legal Opinion

Cox v. Greil Bros. Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 12, 1922No. 3 Div. 573PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtAnderson, C. J.

It is a well-settled principle of law, recognized by this and other courts, that the assignment of a bill of lading puts the title to the goods thereby covered in the transferee. This rule applies to unconditional transfers or assignments, but when the shipment is made with bill of lading attached to a draft for the purchase money only a special property in the goods passes to the transferee, subject to be divested by the acceptance and payment of the draft. Cosmos Cotton Co. v. First National Bank, 171 Ala. 392, 54 South. 621, 32 L. R. A. (N. S.) 1173, Ann. Cas. 1913B, 42, and authorities…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Exchange Bank v. RichMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
  2. McCormick & Richardson v. Joseph & AndersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
  3. Cosmos Cotton Co. v. 1st National BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  4. Haas & Co. v. Citizens BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1905
  5. Manufacturers' Commercial Co. v. Rochester Ry. Co.New York Supreme Court · 1909

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Massey v. United States Steel CorporationSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API