Legal Opinion

Rug Doctor, L.P. v. Prate

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 1, 2001No. COA00-572PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BIGGS, Judge.

This appeal arises from the trial court’s denial of plaintiff-appellant’s motion for preliminary injunction involving a covenant not to compete. We find that as of the filing of this opinion, the twelve month prohibition imposed by the covenant has expired, thus rendering the issues raised by the plaintiff-appellant moot. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.

In July 1997, James Prate (Prate) was hired as a district manager for Industrial Clean Management (ICM), a division of Rug Doctor, L.P. (Rug Doctor). As a condition of employment, Prate was required to sign a non-compete…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. A.E.P. Industries, Inc. v. McClureSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. Benvenue Parent-Teacher Ass'n v. Nash County Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  3. United Telephone Co. of Carolinas, Inc. v. Universal Plastics, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  4. Herff Jones Co. v. AllegoodCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. McAdoo v. University of North CarolinaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  2. Bessemer City Express, Inc. v. City of Kings MountainCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  3. Artis & Associates v. AuditoreCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  4. Corpening Insurance Center, Inc. v. HaaffCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  5. Allen Indus., Inc. v. KluttzCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API