Legal Opinion

Zettlemoyer v. Fulcomer

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided March 20, 1991No. 88-5543PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

923 F.2d 284

Keith W. ZETTLEMOYER, Appellant,

v.

Thomas A. FULCOMER, Superintendent, State Correctional

Institution at Huntingdon, Pennsylvania and

Honorable Leroy S. Zimmerman, Attorney

General of the Commonwealth of

Pennsylvania, Appellees.

No. 88-5543.

United States Court of Appeals,

Third Circuit.

Argued March 30, 1989.

Reargued Oct. 12, 1990.

Decided Jan. 16, 1991.

Rehearing and Rehearing In Banc

Denied March 20, 1991.

Thomas B. Schmidt (argued), Pepper, Hamilton & Scheetz, Harrisburg, Pa., for appellant.

Richard A. Lewis, Dist. Atty., Todd B. Narvol, Sr. Deputy Dist. Attorney for Dauphin County…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited62 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Townsend v. SainSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rudy Hernandez v. Gary Starbuck, Superintendent of the Wyoming Honor Farm Attorney General of the State of WyomingCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  2. Zilich v. Superint. ReidCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API