Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Benson v. Fore

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 29, 1929No. 18794PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIFFFENDAFFER, C.

This is an action brought by J. 0. Fore, Toy Robinson, T. B. Slick, and N. M. Hancock, defendants in error, hereinafter referred to as plaintiffs, against James S. Benson, Jennie Whitfield, W. M. Whitfield, Stephen Pompey, Izora Pompey (Dindy), B. C. Franklin, Moty Cudjo, Lucy Cudjo, and Emroy W. Walton, plaintiffs in error, hereinafter referred to as defendants, to quiet title to certain real estate located in Seminole county, Okla.

It appears from the record that the S.W.% of section 23 and the N.E.% of the N.E.14 of section 27, twp. 7 N., R. 7 E., constituted the allotment…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kincaid v. McGowanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1887
  2. Bryan v. SullivanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Depuy v. SelbySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  4. v. Northern Pacific RailroadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Carlson v. CurrenWashington Supreme Court · 1908

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hargis v. HargisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  2. Covington v. AnthonySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  3. Parnacher v. MountSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
  4. Gulley v. ChristianSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
  5. Renegar v. FlemingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API