Bartlett v. State of California
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GILBERT, J.
Here we affirm a summary judgment in favor of the State of California (State), found by the trial court to be immune from liability because of the “natural conditions” immunity. Plaintiff, who was injured while riding a recreational vehicle on the sand dunes at Pismo Beach, did not present evidence sufficient to create a triable issue of fact as to whether the public property was improved or whether the injury was caused by an unnatural or “hybrid” condition.
Facts
Appellant Linda Bartlett was injured while riding an all terrain vehicle (ATV) on the sand dunes at the Pismo…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Parker v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.California Supreme Court · 1970
- Fuller v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Empire West v. Southern California Gas Co.California Supreme Court · 1974
- Osgood v. County of ShastaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Gonzales v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Knight v. City of CapitolaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Soules v. Cadam, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1991
- Meddock v. County of Yolo CA3California Court of Appeal · 2013
- Morin v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- ASTENIUS v. StateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.