Morgan v. D. W. Alderman & Sons' Co.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before Klugi-i, J., Greenville, April, 1904. Action by Morgan & Austin against D. W. Alderman & Sons Co. From judgment for plaintiffs, defendants appeal. cites: No one but defendant could move to dissolve attachment: 17 S. C., 116; 37 -S. C., 233; Code of Proe., 265. cites: Respondent can make point that appellant acquired no lien by attachment: 24 S. C., 404; 35 S. C., 95; 30 S. C., 117; 17 S. C., 123.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Jones.
This is a controversy between plaintiffs and.defendants as to' which of them have prior lien on certain money now in the hands of the sheriff of Greenville County. This money was received by the sheriff under a warrant of attachment in the case of D. W. Alderman & Sons Co. v. J. P. Clark and J. R. Bennyfield, partners as Clark & Bennyfield, which warrant was issued against the real and personal property of J. P. Clark, on the ground that he was a non-resident, having left the State to defraud his creditors; and, in the warrant, the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Whitfield v. HoveySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1889
3Cited by2 opinions
- Lowndes Hill Realty Co. v. Greenville Concrete Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1956
- C.R. Meyer & Sons Co. v. Custom Mechanical CSRA, LLCCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2015