Legal Opinion
James Skertich, Margaret Skertich, and Backes, Friesen & Wolf, Apc v. Zale Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 28, 1993No. 91-55327Published
1Opinion of the Court
15 F.3d 1089
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
James SKERTICH, Margaret Skertich, Plaintiffs,
and
Backes, Friesen & Wolf, APC, Appellant,
v.
ZALE CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 91-55327.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued Feb. 7, 1992.
Submission Deferred Feb. 7, 1992.
Resubmitted Dec. 23, 1993.
Decided Dec. 28, 1993.
Before: ALARCON, BEEZER and RYMER,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Pavelic & LeFlore v. Marvel Entertainment Group, Div. of Cadence Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Sam Giebelhaus Charlotte Giebelhaus v. Spindrift Yachts R. Anthony Bell World Trader Yachts, Inc. John Frederick Roberts Elizabeth Marlene RobertsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Hudson v. Moore Business Forms, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation v. John L. Molinaro, and Kurahara & Morrissey, Real Party in Interest-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991