Legal Opinion

Petroski v. Eaton Yale & Towne, Inc.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1970No. 313PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.

In the recent case of Wittka v. Hartnell (1970), 46 Wis. 2d 374, 175 N. W. 2d 248, a safe-place statute case, we held that, where a judgment was entered on a motion for directed verdict dismissing a complaint, appellate review of the alleged errors of the trial court would not be entertained as a matter of right where no post-trial motions with respect to the issues raised had been made prior to the appeal. We relied therein upon Jonas v. Northeastern Mut. Fire Ins. Co. (1969), 44 Wis. 2d 347, 171 N. W. 2d 185, which explicated the rule of Wells v. Dairyland Mut. Ins. Co. (1957), 274 Wis.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wells v. Dairyland Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Schwenn v. Loraine Hotel Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Miller v. Welworth TheatresWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Jonas v. Northeastern Mutual Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Wittka v. HartnellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Physicians Plus Insurance v. Midwest Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Norma F. Jones v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
  3. Stevens Construction Corp. v. FisherWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Physicians Plus Insurance v. Midwest Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API