Legal Opinion

Soper v. Industrial Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1958PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWingert, J.

1. Intervening injury. Credible evidence in the record sustains the commission’s finding that the condition of plaintiff’s left knee for which he was operated on was not the result of the injury he suffered on September 29, 1954, but was due to intervening injury which occurred in February, 1955.

Dr. Kampine testified that on February 15, 1955, plaintiff came in complaining of his left knee, and said he had slipped on the ice at a filling station which he owned. Plaintiff first denied having had any accident since September 29th, but later admitted that on or about February 15th while walking…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Beem v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Johnston v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Schuh v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Molinaro v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Sheehan v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Fort Howard Paper Co. v. State of Wisconsin Lake District Board of ReviewWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Fitz v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Gallagher v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Bumpas v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API