Legal Opinion

Green Duck Co. v. Patterson & Hoffman

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 23, 1912No. 2259PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error from Oklahoma County Court; Sam Hooker, Judge. Action by the Green Duck Company against Patterson & Hoffman. Judgment ’for defendants, and plaintiff brings error..

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

BREWER, C.

The' Green Duck Company, plaintiff in error here, as plaintiff below, filed suit in the county court of Oklahoma county, ’on November 5, 1909, against the defendants in error, Patterson & Hoffman, as defendants below,, alleging an indebtedness in the sum of $230 for certain merchandise sold by plaintiff to defendants. The defendants gave to an agent of plaintiff the'following written order:

“Order No. 400. The Green Duck Company. Ship to-Patterson & Hoffman, at Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. How to- ship: Express. When: Feby. 20, 1909. Terms: 2 per cent., 10 days. 30 days net.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cooper v. Ft. Smith & W. R. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  2. Standard Lumber Co. v. Miller & Vidor Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  3. Henderson v. McFaddenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1901

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. ProbstSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Brunson v. Carter Oil Co.District Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 1919
  3. Sunshine Cloak & Suit Co. v. Roquette Bros.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Oklahoma State Fair Exposition v. Lippert Bros., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1957
  5. Kaiser v. CrouchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1972

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API