In re McLean
New York Supreme Court
On reargument. For opinion on appeal, see 3 FT. Y. Supp. 45. For order granting motion for rearguinent, see 5 FT. Y. Supp. 946.
1Opinion of the CourtDaniels, J.
The appeal in this proceeding has already been before this general term, and decided, but a reargument was ordered on account of a misapprehension concerning the existence of a previously repealed section of chapter 410 of the Laws of 1882, providing for the means of correcting the tax after it had been imposed. The proceeding was instituted as it has been provided for by section 857 of this act, and it has been carried on in conformity to the requirements of this section. But it was resisted on the ground that the tax was larger by the sum of $125.32 than the corporation was liable to pay on…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Stuart v. . PalmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Susquehanna Bank v. . Supervisors of Broome CountyNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
- Mayor, Etc., of City of N.Y. v. . DavenportNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
- Buffalo & State Line Railroad v. Board of SupervisorsCommission of Appeals · 1871
- Baldwin v. . City of BuffaloNew York Court of Appeals · 1866
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. Manhattan Fire InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1890
- Austin v. Westchester Telephone Co.The Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo · 1894