Nelson v. Brannon
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.
1. The declarations of a defendant in ft. fa., made after the pendency of litigation, are inadmissible in the trial of a claim case (Civil Code of 1910, § 5776 (4)); but “declarations of the defendant in execution, made up to the time of the levy and while he was in possession, that he owned the property levied on, are admissible in evidence, if there is any evidence that he was in possession of the property at the time of the levy.” Smiley v. Padgett, 123 Ga. 39 (1), 40 (50 S. E. 927); Rutledge v. Hudson, 80 Ga. 267 (6), 271 (5 S. E. 93); Rountree v. Gaulden, 128 Ga. 737 (2), 741 (58 S. E.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hannon v. . GrizzardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
- Rountree v. GauldenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
- Andrews v. SimsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
- Manley v. McKenzieSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
- Smiley v. PadgettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Bacon v. Hinesville BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928