Legal Opinion

Crockett v. Lewis

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 15, 1877PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Putnam Circuit Court. — Hon. John W. Henry, Judge

1Opinion of the CourtNorton, J.

— The record in this case shows no final judgment from which a writ of error can be prosecuted. It shows that the jury retired, and after a short time returned into court their verdict as follows: “.Non Suit.” “ It is therefore considered by the court that the defendant do have and recover against the plaintiffs his costs in this suit laid out and expended, and that he have thereof execution.” The writ of error will, with the concurrence of the other judges, therefore be dismissed under the authority of Boggess v. Cox, 48 Mo. 278.

Dismissed.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Boggess v. CoxSupreme Court of Missouri · 1871

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gates v. SolomonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1904
  2. Reesman v. RollinsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1904
  3. A. A. Cooper Wagon & Buggy Co. v. CornellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1908
  4. State ex rel. Love v. NewtonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1887