Legal Opinion

Watson v. Kemp

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 15, 1871PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Failure of Consideration. Equity Jurisdiction. Before Judge Harrell. Terrell Superior Court. May Term, 1870. Kemp sued Watson on his promissory note for $200 00, dated the 3d of January, 1867, and payable to Kemp on the following Christmas.

Read the full summary

Failure of Consideration. Equity Jurisdiction. Before Judge Harrell. Terrell Superior Court. May Term, 1870. Kemp sued Watson on his promissory note for $200 00, dated the 3d of January, 1867, and payable to Kemp on the following Christmas. Watson pleaded that the note was give for lot number ninety-four, on which Watson resided on the 3d of January, 1867; that Kemp represented to him that he, Kemp, had a good title to said lot, which he made Watson believe; that these representations were false and made only to defraud Watson, and in consideration of said ,|:note, Kemp turned over to him a…

1Opinion of the CourtEochrane, C. J.

It appears from the record that Kemp brought his suit against Watson on a promissory note given for a lot of land. Upon the trial, Watson filed his plea, alleging that the note was given for lot of land number ninety-four in the sixth district of Terrel county, on which he then resided; that Kemp represented he had a good title to the lot, which he induced him *to believe; that these representations were false, and intended to defraud him; that when the-note was given, Kemp only gave him a quit-claim, made to him by one Weaver, that Weaver had no right, title or interest in the land, and had…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sanderlin v. WillisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
  2. Crowell v. BrimSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  3. Dunn v. MillsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
  4. Chambless v. CainCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API