Legal Opinion

McGrew v. Town of Lettsville

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 9, 1887PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeals from Louisa Gvrouit Court. Action in chancery to restrain defendants, the town of Lettsville and its officers, from opening certain streets and alleys, which plaintiff's aver have been vacated. A motion to dissolve a temporary injunction allowed in the case, made after answer, and after an agreed statement of facts was filed by the parties, was overruled, and thereupon defendants appeal. The causes being alike as to the facts and pleadings, are submitted together.

1Opinion of the Court

Beck J.

1. cities and towns : vacation of plat : who may vacate : "proprietors :" Code §§ 563, 564. I. The record before us shows that plaintiffs, owned separately certain lots and blocks in the town of Lettsville, which were used, with other lands ^ey owned adjacent thereto, for agricultural purposes; no streets or alleys ever having been opened through them. They united in a written instrument, prescribed by Code, § 563, for the purpose of vacating that part of the town plat covering the blocks, lots and streets in question. We think the record *151shows that plaintiffs are the separate owners…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lorenzen v. PrestonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1880

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Chrisman v. Omaha & Council Bluffs Railway & Bridge Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  2. City of Lamoure v. LasellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Bowersox v. Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1918
  4. McKinney v. RowlandSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API