Legal Opinion

Padden v. City of New York

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1904PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Action by municipal officer who has been wrongfully discharged to recover salary. Defense set off.

1Opinion of the CourtGarretson, J.

' The plaintiff having been reinstated as a fireman in the fire department of the city, by virtue of the final determination in the proceeding wherein he invoked the aid of the writ of mandamus against the fire commissioner, it follows that he is entitled to recover the salary incident to the office, unless there is merit in the defendant’s first affirmative defense. So much of such defense as alleges that the plaintiff rendered no services to the city during the period alleged in the complaint (which is the time during which he was unlawfully prevented by the commissioner from performing his…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Ryan v. . GreenNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  2. Fitzsimmons v. . City of BrooklynNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  3. People Ex Rel. Gilchrist v. . MurrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1878

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Board of Education v. BaconCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
  2. Reising v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Hammitt v. GaynorNew York Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Fort Smith v. QuinnSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
  5. Olson v. City of SuperiorWisconsin Supreme Court · 1942

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API