Smith v. Sherman
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Oakland. (Stickney, J.) Creditor’s bill. Defendant Hall appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.
Complainant, who is a judgment creditor of Jonathan Sherman, brought his bill to have a deed made *638by Sherman to ITall, his son-in-law, declared fraudulent and void as against his execution rights. It appeared on the hearing that the sheriff levied on the land before bill filed. The bill as originally drawn omitted this averment, but it was not demurred to, and the testimony was taken on the whole issues. On the hearing the bill was allowed to be amended so as to include this charge, and wo think that as the case stood it was proper.
The sale was made while complainant was urging his demand,…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Crawford v. HoeftMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
- Kunze v. SolomonMichigan Supreme Court · 1901