Legal Opinion

Decker v. Carr

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1896PublishedCited by 1 opinion

• Appeal by the plaintiff, Casper G. Decker, as receiver, etc., of Francis G. Hall, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the defendants, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Chemung on the 6th day of May, 1896, upon the decision of the court rendered after a trial at the Chemung Special Term dismissing the plaintiff’s complaint.

1Opinion of the Court

Merwin, J.:

The object of this action is to set aside, as a nullity, as to Francis G-. Hall and the plaintiff as representing his interest, the following instrument:

“ Dansville, July 22, 1884.
“ For value received, and to secure any indebtedness which F. GL Hall may now owe or become liable for hereafter, we hereby sell, assign and set over unto S. S. Hamlin or Betsey P. Hall all our right, title and interest, vested and contingent, in and to the interest of Hiland S. Hall in the estate of Hiland B. Hall, deceased, and under the will of Asher P. Hamlin, wherein Betsey P. Hall was conditional…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jackson, ex dem. Reeves v. ToppingNew York Supreme Court · 1828
  2. Phelps v. BostwickNew York Supreme Court · 1856
  3. Long Island Rail Road v. ConklinNew York Supreme Court · 1860

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Schmidt v. Magnetic Head Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API