Legal Opinion

Jones v. FLUOR DANIEL SERVICES CORP.

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 2010No. 2008-CA-00456-SCTPublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PIERCE, Justice,

for the Court.

¶ 1. This case comes before this Court for the second time on appeal from the Jasper County Circuit Court’s grant of Fluor Daniel Services Corporation’s Motion for Summary Judgment. The trial court dismissed the plaintiffs’ claims of intentional infliction of emotional distress with prejudice as barred by the statute of limitations. We affirm the trial court on all issues.

FACTS

¶ 2. The six plaintiffs in this case are all African-American males and former employees of Fluor Daniel Services Corporation. While employed with Fluor Daniel, they worked under the direct…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. MS Credit Center, Inc. v. HortonMississippi Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Russell v. Performance Toyota, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Stephens v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of USMississippi Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Mantachie Nat. Gas v. Miss. Valley Gas Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Simmons v. Thompson MacHinery of Miss., Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1994

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Sanderson Farms, Inc. v. D. D. McCulloughMississippi Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Trustmark National Bank v. MeadorMississippi Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Kinsey v. Pangborn Corp.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Empire Abrasive Equipment Corp. v. MorganMississippi Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Carter v. ReddixCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2012

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API