Legal Opinion

City of Sherman v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 22, 1896No. 805PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appellee held a valid judgment against the city, rendered upon a tort, and brought this action of mandamus to require the city and its common council to levy a tax sufficient to pay the judgment and costs, together with the costs of this proceeding, and to require the assessor and collector to do what was necessary to carry into effect such levy; or, if the court should determine that the city could not levy a greater tax than that then levied for city purposes, then that the officers of the city be commanded and compelled to provide, if necessary, by ordinance, a special fund out of the tax…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Corpus Christi v. WoessnerTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Gray v. National Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1885
  3. Turner & Seymour Manufacturing Co. v. Dover Stamping Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1884

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hammond v. PlaceMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Barker v. State Ex Rel. NapoleonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Capps v. Citizens' Nat. Bank of LongviewCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
  4. Joy v. City of TerrellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  5. Matagorda County v. HornCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API