Legal Opinion

Ibrahim v. Kriebel

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided April 5, 2006No. 04-1630PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Jibril L. Ibrahim appeals from an order of the United States District Court for the *130Middle District of Pennsylvania, denying his motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ifp). We will affirm the Court’s order.

Ibrahim filed a complaint in Pennsylvania’s Court of Common Pleas for Union County. That Court granted Ibrahim’s motion to proceed ifp, but issued a Rule to Show Cause why the case should not be transferred to federal court or dismissed. After Ibrahim responded, the Court entered an order noting that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction, and transferred the matter to the United…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bloom v. FineSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ibrahim v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API