Legal Opinion

Dehart v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 3, 1992No. 91-1282PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

We reverse appellant’s habitual offender sentence and remand for resentencing within the sentencing guidelines. As we did in Johnson v. State, 589 So.2d 1370 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991), and Claybourne v. State, 600 So.2d 516 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992), we certify the following question as one of great public importance. Additionally, we note conflict between the cases cited above and Beaubrum v. State, 595 So.2d 254 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992), Jamison v. State, 583 *1345So.2d 413 (Fla. 4th DCA), rev. denied, 591 So.2d 182 (Fla.1991), McCall v. State, 583 So.2d 411 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991), juris, accepted, 593 So.2d 1052…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Johnson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  2. McCall v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  3. Claybourne v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  4. Beaubrum v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  5. Jamison v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. DehartSupreme Court of Florida · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API