Linde v. Gaffke
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Sibley county to recover $219.90 damages for conversion. The case was tried before Cad well, J., and a jury, which rendered a verdict in favor of plaintiff. From an order denying a motion for a new trial, defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the Court
BROWN, 1.
Action to recover for the conversion of a quantity of wheat, which plaintiff alleges was her property. Defendant took and converted the wheat, as sheriff, under an execution against the plaintiff’s husband. Plaintiff had a verdict, and defendant appeals from an order denying a new trial.
We find nothing in any of the assignments of error to require extended notice. There was ho error in refusing to strike out the testimony of witness Papke. He was a farmer, and presumed to know the value of the wheat (McLennan v. Minneapolis & N. E. Co., 57 Minn. 317, 59 N. W. 628); and, besides, the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- McLennan v. Minneapolis & Northern Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
3Cited by2 opinions
- Grimm v. GrimmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
- Albrethsen v. ClementsIdaho Supreme Court · 1929